Source control
Identify who owns, operates and can change the source or supply agreement.
Factory planning for water bottling projects
Compare locations before buying land or signing a lease
Select a site by testing the complete factory, approval and operating needs against each candidate location. Cheap land or an empty building can become expensive when source-water, power, discharge, access, hygienic flow, warehouse, labor or expansion conditions are not verified before commitment.
Answer first
Compare candidate locations against mandatory water-source, approval, utility, discharge, access and physical conditions, then score conversion cost, logistics, labor, operating resilience and expansion using the same evidence standard.

01
Agree the criteria, mandatory exclusions, evidence quality and decision authority before scoring. A high total must not override a failed legal, water-source, safety or essential-utility condition.
| Criterion | What to verify | Evidence status | Decision treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water source | Rights or supply basis, yield, quality, seasonality and protection | Verified / provisional / unknown | Mandatory hold if the product basis depends on it |
| Utilities and discharge | Power, water, air, cooling where needed, drainage and wastewater route | Capacity and quality under the intended operating case | Evaluate incoming supply, on-site generation and local distribution separately |
| Building and land | Dimensions, structure, access, zones, vehicle flow, storage and expansion | Surveyed facts and local design review | Record adaptation and opportunity cost |
| Location and services | Transport, port, labor, maintenance, laboratory, suppliers and emergency support | Current route and provider evidence | Test disruption and lead-time exposure |
| Approvals and neighbors | Land use, source, food production, discharge, construction and operating path | Competent-party confirmation | Do not infer approval from similar businesses |
02
The water source and intended product can determine whether a location remains viable. Verify source status, representative quality, sustainable availability, protection, treatment implications and the route for reject, backwash and cleaning streams.
Identify who owns, operates and can change the source or supply agreement.
Use current sampling that reflects relevant seasonal or operating variation; record gaps instead of inventing stability.
Confirm whether the intended product category and claims remain possible after the required treatment.
Include product, rinsing, cleaning, backwash, membrane reject and non-process demand in the site basis.
03
Request written service information and test the route from source to every machine connection. Separate incoming capacity, on-site generation, storage, treatment, distribution, backup and metering responsibilities.
| System | Site-selection question | Evidence before commitment |
|---|---|---|
| Electricity | Can the service, transformer and distribution support connected and starting loads? | Provider basis, measured condition and preliminary load schedule |
| Compressed air and cooling | Can quality, pressure, flow, heat rejection and redundancy be delivered? | Concept, room and maintenance/access allowance |
| Drainage and wastewater | Where can each process, cleaning and storm stream legally and safely go? | Stream list, peaks, local acceptance route and qualified design input |
| Continuity | Which interruptions can stop or contaminate production? | Backup, storage, recovery and restart concept |
04
Walk the route for incoming materials, equipment delivery, people, packaging, product, waste, forklifts and finished goods. Measure openings, heights, columns, floor conditions, drainage points, maintenance clearances, loading and future expansion instead of relying on gross floor area.
Test treatment, hygienic storage, bottle supply, filling, labeling, packing and utility rooms as connected zones.
Protect receiving, line-side staging, finished-goods storage and dispatch from avoidable crossings and congestion.
Confirm unloading, turning, lifting, door openings, temporary removal and route to final position.
Reserve a usable equipment, access, utility, drainage and warehouse path for the identified future stage.
05
Compare adaptation, utility generation, wastewater, access, transport, staffing, security, compliance work and downtime exposure for each location. Keep purchase or rent, factory conversion and recurring operating differences visible as separate decision lines.
| Cost layer | Examples to compare | Do not hide |
|---|---|---|
| Commitment | Purchase, lease, deposits, taxes and conditions | Exit, renewal and change restrictions |
| Conversion | Structure, rooms, drains, utilities, roads and permits | Temporary work and production delay |
| Recurring | Utility tariffs, transport, labor, services and waste handling | Reliability, quality and escalation assumptions |
| Constraint value | Lost output, limited expansion or added handling | Opportunity cost that is absent from contractor quotations |
06
Create a site file with the survey, source evidence, service information, local reviews, preliminary layout, cost comparison, risks and written exceptions. Assign each open point an owner and consequence, then make the approval conditional on the evidence that could still change the choice.
Use when a mandatory source, approval, safety, utility or physical condition cannot be supported.
Use when the site remains feasible and the conversion scope, cost, schedule and responsible party are accepted.
Use a time-limited option or condition when a decisive test, permit or service confirmation is still pending.
Approve the preferred site with its assumptions, residual risks and next design inputs attached.
R
These primary sources support risk-based planning and controlled project review. They do not provide a project price, approve a site or replace current requirements and qualified local decisions.
World Health Organization
World Health Organization
Codex Alimentarius
Buyer questions
No. First identify mandatory source, approval, utility, discharge, access and physical conditions. Compare property cost only after a candidate can support the intended factory and operating model.
Possibly, but only after a measured fit-gap review covers structure, clear height, access, hygienic zones, drainage, utilities, material flow, storage, local approvals and the cost and schedule of adaptation.
Do not give an unknown a favorable score. Mark it as an open risk, assign the test or confirmation, record its decision consequence and delay commitment when it could reverse the site choice.
No. It prepares questions and evidence for the competent authorities and qualified local designers. They must determine the current site-specific legal and construction requirements.
Move this project question forward
Request written service information and test the route from source to every machine connection. Separate incoming capacity, on-site generation, storage, treatment, distribution, backup and metering responsibilities.
Not sure which data matters? Send what you have and state the decision you need to make.
Send target capacity and SKUs, source-water report, site utility schedule, building layout and required project milestones.
The project desk can identify missing inputs and a practical next step. Final engineering, configuration, compliance and commercial terms remain project-specific.
Allot Tech (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. · sales@allottech.com · Project telephone: +86 186 6213 1120 / +1 818 262 0958